Effects of War Presented in Journey’s End Compared with Impact of War Shown in Strange Meeting Essay

Explore the commissions in which the piths of state of contend on the various(prenominal) atomic number 18 gratuityed in Journeys dying. Then comp be the ways in which Sherriff presents the resolutions of state of war on the individual with the ways in which agglomerate shows the impact of war on timbres in Strange Meeting. The character reference most obviously alter by the war in Journeys End is Stanhope. We gyp proterozoic on in the tender that Stanhope drinks very heavily when Osborne and barefaced have a conversation ab bulge break through him.I never did break a youngster put away the whisky he does. This is the initial we see of the effects that the war has had on an individual and although there are other characters that are to a fault change, Stanhope appears to be the most prominent. It becomes apparent that Stanhope do a conscious decision to drink as a header mechanism to deal with the war. It was after I came back here- in that terrific affair on Vimy Ridge. I knew Id go emotional if I didnt break the line of merchandise. I couldnt bear cosmos fully conscious all the time Here we learn that it wasnt until a particular attack within the war that Stanhope began to feel the strain and the pressure, and alcohol becomes an escape for him.He says There are except cardinal ways of breaking the strain. One was pretending I was ill- and going stem the other was this. He holds up his glass. Sherriff could have shown us a chela character so deeply acted by alcohol that he had habituated up, whereas Stanhope appears quite the opposite, whereas in Strange Meeting Hill gives us a minor character affected by alcohol. It is also worth noting capital of North Carolinas reaction to his alcoholism is completely different to how Stanhope fears he impart react, and in a way, our reaction too.Rather than look to Stanhope as a washed-out domain who has interpreted the easy route by insobriety excessive amounts, we face to view him as courageous and strong willed. We subsequently learn when he is talking to Hibbert, that Stanhope isnt as strong and immune as we were originally led to believe. Sometimes I feel I could just lie down on this bed and pretend I was paralysed or something- and couldnt move- and just lie there till I died- or was dragged away. The effects of war on Stanhope are presented 2 subtly and obviously.His drinking habits are continually referred to throughout and although we learn early on that it is something that the war has forced him into, his hatred for the war or his weak moments arent made clear to the ratifier until now when he admits his detestation to Hibbert. Hills character, Colonel Garrett in Strange Meeting is similar to Stanhope in the sense that both(prenominal) characters are driven to excessive drinking by the effects of the war. Colonel Garrett has changed and also turned to drink, we know this as the prose reads that Hilliard was appalled he had not dreamed that this could happen and so quickly to a patch like Garrett.Despite this scene beingness the first time we are introduced to Colonel Garrett Hill manages to present the impact the war has had on him through Hilliards reaction to Garretts new state of character. In contrast to Hill, Sheriff is little subtle in his monstrance of Stanhope and the character himself admits his change. It is interesting to respect that Garrett is minor within the fiction whereas Stanhope is a major character in the play which shows the different ways in which each author chose to present the effect of alcohol within their text.At the beginning of the play, capital of North Carolina appears to be pollyannaish and enthusiastic. Even when he is devoteed to go on a attack he seems proud to have been chosen and eager to get out there I say- its most frightfully exciting however, this wear then triggers a change in Raleigh. After Osbornes death, Raleigh becomes distant and resentful towards the other officer s. Good god Dont you understand? How can I sit down and eat that- when- when Osbornes- lying- out there. Not only is he struggling to cope and gentility his voice which he hadnt done before, but he is also shouting at Stanhope.Prior to this, Raleigh had always treated Stanhope with the outcome respect. Similar to Sheriffs character of Raleigh is Hills character of Barton in Strange Meeting who also changes after the impact of experiencing a death. That his face had changed, in the space of a day and a dark that his eyes have taken on the common look of misfortune and misery and exhaustion As with Raleigh in Journeys End, Barton also began the novel full of optimism and energy. However, Sheriff presents the effects of the war on Raleigh by having his character lashing out and blaming others.This contrasts with Hills introduction of Barton, who takes on a more morose, downhearted way of coping. You cannot and must(prenominal) not spend any more time blaming yourself, saying if on ly this and if only that. Its useless. However, the parallel is that both characters change ascribable to another soldiers death which affects the impact on the reader. The effect of the war on Hibbert (Journeys end), another officer in the company, is first off presented subtly, in the way that he speaks of his neuralgia preventing him from carrying on in the war. We soon learn that he wants to go home and is willing to make up any excuse in order to do so.This shows how the war has taken away his pride and dignity as he admits that he would quite a die. Go on, then, shoot You wont let me go to hospital. I swear Ill never go into those trenches again. Shoot and thank god-. The war has affected Hibbert so deeply that he is prepared to die earlier than continue fighting. The character, Harris in Strange Meeting is very similar to Hibbert. Harris has a breakdown when their battalion arrives at Feuvry Then Harris lurched up, and forwards, his head touched his knees and he began t o cry, not lifting his hands to wipe his face.However, where Sheriff presents us with a man so desperate to depart that he is willing to lie active an illness and is prepared to die rather than continue in the war, Hill presents us with an ironic situation. The irony of the situation is that when Harris eventually comes out of the wine cellar he is killed. Both writers choose to present us with individuals so affected by the war that they actually suffer from a breakdown in one way or another. Coulter from Strange Meeting and trotter from Journeys End can also be compared.These two characters are similar in the way that they dont seem to have been affected by the war as they show no signs of degeneration. These two characters are an important contrast to the likes of Barton and Stanhope, whose changes are quite obvious. I feel that not to have changed notably is their response to the war. Coulter and trotting horse both appear to be staying as close to their normal, original selv es as possible as a coping mechanism for the war. It is interesting to note the genre difference between the two texts.Strange Meeting being a novel means that there is far more auxiliary background and descriptive text for each character whereas Journeys End which is a play, must rely on dramatic get together in order to demonstrate the development of a character. A dissever of things which Hill would tell us in her prose must be relayed to the reader through dialogue or actions in the play. Hill could tell us that Barton came to the war excited and enthusiastic, whereas Sherriff would either have his character say how he felt or the stage directions would have to navigate the actor into acquiring this feeling across through actions.This makes each authors presentation of the effects of the war on the individual different automatically. Hill and Sherriff both present the effects that the war has on individuals through similar characters. They present to the reader how the death and destruction within the war can affect even the most strong and positive of men. In both the novel and the play, the authors portray how some men cannot cope with the imminence of what is to come and thereof would rather do anything but deal with it.Both writers examine how war can push men into drinking excessively in order to escape the desperate reality of their situation and use similar characters to sidle up the ways in which war affects individuals, however the difference is in the way that the changes are presented. Hill is often more subtle in her presentation of her characters whereas Sherriff more blunt. Despite these differences, the negative effects of war on the individual characters are consistent in both works.