Security and privacy on the Internet Research Paper

Security and concealing on the Internet - Research Paper voiceIndividuals generally assume that such information is kept secret by the websites and resources that they entrust with these details however, data mines like those on the internet can well be manipulated and used such that compromising information can be turned over. The roles of organized parties in the relationship between individual data provider and collectors of data be not as clear as they should be. For example, one might wonder what the role of internet service providers are, or what the governments role is, or what the websites themselves are obligated to do in these circumstances. Although these other parties may, in fact, have a role in ensuring internet privacy and security, lastly the responsibility lies on the part of the individual person or entity in protecting his or her (or its) information. In terms of the governments role in regulating for internet privacy and security, it seems that the United Sta tes has not lived up to the international standards of privacy protection and comprehensive regulation, which creates a logistical problem for managing the use and step of internet resources between borders. Although new laws have started to address issues such as childrens privacy, financial privacy, and medical privacy, privacy and security regulations related to the internet are likely to be issues in the future (Hiller, 2010, p. 263). Clearly, the government perceives for itself a role in managing the privacy and security concerns of a dynamic technological environment. Understandably, this role ought to be kept at a minimal stage, given the inability of governments to react fast enough to changes in technology. A more relevant perspective for judgment the roles of the parties involved in internet privacy and security is analyzing individuals from the perspective of psychological research. Psychology plays a central role in the issue of privacy because of neighborly attitudes toward the prospect of an individual self, which entitles individuals to a certain degree of space from others (Buchanan, Paine, Joinson, & Reips, 2007, p. 157). In addition, this separation of the self from others trains people, in general, to avoid disclosing personal information about themselves, peculiarly because this information might be useful in an ever-connected society that modern people live in. For instance, something as mundane as a routine philia exam, if discovered by an employer by some means that violated its employees privacy, could be used to raise that employees insurance premiums through the company line and thus causing him a disadvantage. Of course, the value of privacy differs from person to person but generally as a society, people tend to agree that privacy is a concern when it comes to dealing with interactions online (Buchanan, Paine, Joinson, & Reips, 2007, p. 160). This kind of attitude is ever more prevalent amongst older generations, who treat the ir private information as secrets. According to Reeves, Rowe and Gallaher (2007), a better solution when compared to putting individual interests wholly in charge of managing their online privacy and security or entrusting that responsibility to the government is giving some responsibility to internet service providers (ISPs). Some companies that provide internet services to thousands or millions of customers are, according to this report, responsible for making sure privacy is secured. While it is